No one really knows how the High Plains got so high. 麻豆视频 70 million years ago, eastern Colorado, southeastern Wyoming, western Kansas and western Nebraska were near sea level. Since then, the region has risen about 2 kilometers, leading to some head scratching at geology conferences. 听
Now researchers at the Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences () and the Department of Geological Sciences at the 麻豆视频 have proposed a new way to explain the uplift: Water trapped deep below Earth鈥檚 crust may have flooded the lower crust, creating buoyancy and lift. The research appears online this week in the journal and could represent a new mechanism for elevating broad regions of continental crust.
鈥淭he High Plains are perplexing because there is no deformation鈥攕uch as major faults or volcanic activity鈥攊n the area to explain how this big, vast area got elevated,鈥 said lead author Craig Jones, a CIRES fellow and associate professor of geology at CU-Boulder. 鈥淲hat we suggest is that by hydrating the lower crust, it became more buoyant, and the whole thing came up.鈥
鈥淚t鈥檚 like flooding Colorado from below,鈥 Jones said.
Jones and his colleagues propose the water came from the subducting Farallon oceanic plate under the Pacific Ocean 75 to 45 million years ago. This slab slid underneath the North American continental plate, bringing with it a tremendous amount of water bound in minerals. Trapped and under great pressure and heat, the water was released from the oceanic plate and moved up through the mantle and toward the lower crust. There, it hydrated lower crust minerals, converting dense ones, like garnet, into lighter ones, such as mica and amphibole.
鈥淚f you get rid of the dense garnet in the lower crust, you get more elevation because the crust becomes more buoyant,鈥 Jones said. 鈥淚t鈥檚 like blowing the water out of a ballast tank in a submarine.鈥
Jones had the lightbulb moment for this idea when colleagues, including co-author Kevin Mahan, were describing xenoliths (pieces of crust ejected by volcanic eruptions) from across Wyoming and Montana. The researchers were reviewing the xenoliths鈥 composition and noticed something striking. Xenoliths near the Canadian border were very rich in garnet. But farther south, the xenoliths were progressively more hydrated, the garnet replaced by mica and other less-dense minerals. In southern Wyoming, all the garnet was gone.
Upon hearing these findings, Jones blurted out, 鈥淵ou鈥檝e solved why Wyoming is higher than Montana,鈥 a puzzle that other theories haven鈥檛 been able to explain.
At the time, Mahan, a CU-Boulder assistant professor of geological sciences, noted that the alteration of garnet was thought to be far too ancient, from more than a billion years ago, to fit the theory. But since then, he and another co-author, former CU-Boulder graduate student Lesley Butcher, dated the metamorphism of one xenolith sample from the Colorado Plateau and discovered it had been hydrated 鈥渙nly鈥 40-70 million years ago.
Past seismic studies also support the new mechanism. These studies show that from the High Plains of Colorado to eastern Kansas, the crustal thickness or density correlates with a decline in elevation, from about 2 kilometers in the west to near sea level in the east. A similar change is seen from northern Colorado north to the Canadian border. In other words, as the crust gets less hydrated, the elevation of the Great Plains also gets lower.
鈥淵ou could say it鈥檚 just by happenstance that we seem to have thicker more buoyant crust in higher-elevation Colorado than in lower-elevation central Kansas,鈥 Jones said, 鈥渂ut why would crust buoyancy magically correlate today with topography if that wasn鈥檛 what created the topography?鈥
Still, Jones is quick to point out that this mechanism 鈥渋s not the answer, but a possible answer. It鈥檚 a starting point that gives other researchers a sense of what to look for to test it,鈥 he said.
CIRES is a partnership of the dministration and the CU-Boulder.
Other co-authors of the , 鈥淐ontinental uplift through crustal hydration,鈥 are and Lang Farmer, both of CIRES and CU-Boulder鈥檚 Department of Geological Sciences. Journalists may obtain a copy of the paper by contacting Kea Giles at kgiles@geosociety.org.
For an animation or to see images, visit听