Makerspaces are creative and unique learning environments that require a different approach to evaluation. Making activities are typically very open-ended with plentiful opportunities for student voice, creativity, problem solving and iteration. Evaluating participants' artifacts, potentially in combination with the Maker(s) describing their design decisions and how they addressed certain challenges, may provide a more thorough and nuanced understanding of participants' learning than other evaluation approaches, such as surveys.
When to Use:ÌýAlong with iterative design process or withÌýfinished Maker products
Estimated Time:ÌýDependent on projects
Participants:ÌýYoung Children, Youth, Adults, Educators
³§³Ü±è±è±ô¾±±ð²õ:ÌýFlexible depending on setting and group.Ìý
- Maker projects can range from using no-cost recycled materials to high end technology such as 3D printers and laser cutters
- Evaluation methods can includeÌýobservations, surveys, portfolios, and student reflection
Toolkits:ÌýEvaluation of Maker products help assess learning and understanding in different areas.
MakEval from Adam Maltese provides assessment tools to address areas specific to maker activities:
- Creativity - The creative making environment and creative mindset
- Critical thinking and problem solving - Observing, Interpreting, Evaluating, Associating, Curiosity, Honesty, Problem-Finding, Open Mindedness, Systems Thinking.
- Agency / Independence - Shifts in perception of project and of self throughÌýportfolios, interviews, surveys, post-project reflection
- Involvement in STEM practices - measuring engagement in informal and formal settings throughÌýan observation tool, survey, peer-to-peer interview protocol, and tweet-wall.
- Development of interest and identity in STEM/making - survey questions using direct and indirect questioning related to interest and engagement in maker activities and skills and understanding of STEM career paths
Maker Ed Toolkit provides frameworks for assessment during maker activities and throughout the design process:
- Setting Context - Educators and learners to build a common understanding of the learning constructs, fully participate in the assessment process, and collect rich evidence that supports overall learning and teaching.
- Evidence Collection -ÌýÌýTools for quantitative and qualitativeÌýevidence and data collection, and self-, peer-, and teacher-led assessment. As part of the process of collecting evidence, meaning-making of the evidence — by teachers and students alike — is also occurring and ongoing.
- Evidence Interpretation and Communication - Tools that support the accumulation, organization, curation, and analysis of collected evidence over time. Teachers and students work together to interpret the data,Ìýreflecting on the visible learning that occurred, and use the information to inform teaching and facilitation as well as learner growth and development.
Resources:
by Adam Maltese
Ìýdeveloped byÌýMIT Playful Journey Lab, Maker Ed, NSF, Albemarle County Public Schools, Portola Valley School District, and the San Mateo County Office of EducationÌý
Ìý