麻豆视频

Skip to main content

Studying the Marshall Fire recovery to help communities rebuild

A team of people looking at the remains of a building.

Related News

Webinar: Building Capacity for Safe, Disaster-Resilient Housing - Sept. 20

Tuesday, Sept. 20 | 12:00 p.m. |

Safe, disaster-resilient housing is critical to our way of life, prosperity, and sense of security. Yet, many houses remain vulnerable to damage from earthquakes, hurricanes, and other hazards, affecting communities in the near and long term.

In this webinar, Professors Amy Javernick-Will and Abbie Liel will describe findings from research that their team conducted to enhance housing safety in the multi-hazard context of Puerto Rico.

Considering that a large portion of housing stock is built informally, where building codes and regulations may not be followed, they argue that how builders and residents perceive housing safety influences how housing is designed, built, and maintained.

Focusing on one misalignment, the installation of hurricane straps, they will discuss their initial efforts to build capacity in the region by partnering with a community-based organization.

The Marshall fire screamed across the prairie, exploding into homes with 80 mph winds and destroying entire neighborhoods. It caused over a billion dollars in damage in less than a day and took everything from more than 1,000 homeowners in Superior and Louisville, Colorado, leaving behind little more than ash and concrete foundations.

Nine months have passed since the disaster, and as families work to rebuild, an interdisciplinary team of 麻豆视频 researchers has received a major National Science Foundation grant to study long-term community impacts to help improve outcomes from future disasters.

鈥淚n this project, we鈥檙e really interested in how jurisdictions and homeowners are rebuilding, particularly in light of future risks,鈥 said Amy Javernick-Will, a professor of civil, environmental and architectural engineering and lead investigator on the grant. 鈥淭here have been other fires in California and Oregon, but the scale of this destruction was pretty dramatic.鈥

As disasters increase, destroying homes and infrastructure, families and governments have to make decisions on how to rebuild. Those decisions include adoption and enforcement of building codes that can have a long-term influence on community outcomes in resiliency and environmental sustainability. Those codes, however, come with a tradeoff, including potential increased costs and time to rebuild.

It is an obstacle facing one member of the research team first-hand. Matthew Koschmann, an associate professor of communications, owns a rental property in Superior that was destroyed by the fire.

鈥淒o I want to incorporate this new ordinance or opt out? I鈥檓 part of these conversations on Slack channels online. Some people are saying we should upgrade our houses to be more fire resilient, that it will help protect the entire neighborhood, but others are saying the added cost to their rebuild is insurmountable,鈥 Koschmann said.

The research is particularly focused on the social aspect of rebuilding: how communities are connecting, influencing each other, and making major decisions about moving forward. A goal of the grant is  to provide guidance on the decisions and uncertainties homeowners and governments face during the rebuilding process and identifying the processes and codes that meet collective goals after a disaster.

鈥淚n fires, what your neighbors do affects your property,鈥 Javernick-Will said. 鈥淭his shared action is really important, and we want to uncover this process. Most studies look at just the immediate response, the first couple of weeks. There are far fewer long-term studies.鈥

Much of the work will be conducted through personal interviews with homeowners, as well as builders, insurance companies, and municipal government officials. Noah Gershon, a civil engineering PhD student, is leading this part of the effort.

鈥淭here is a complicated interplay between the different groups,鈥 Gershon said. 鈥淲e want to study each to see how we can make things better. There鈥檚 a perception that after a disaster, everything is taken care of and funding is available for everyone. It鈥檚 just not true. Homeowners have to figure out a lot themselves. We want to improve that process.鈥

A goal of the work is to bridge the gap between engineering and human social interaction to understand the real-world impacts of decision making after disasters.

鈥淭here are complex social interactions here. It isn鈥檛 just technical scientific stuff. It鈥檚 both,鈥 Koschmann said. 鈥淭here鈥檚 a level of stress and tension that鈥檚 part of it and dealing with different insurance policies, neighbors, building codes. This isn鈥檛 abstract. It has real personal impact.鈥

In addition to Javernick-Will, Koschmann, and Gershon, the research team also includes Abbie Liel, a professor of civil, environmental and architectural engineering, and Megan Ellery, a civil engineering PhD student.