Published: April 29, 2020

There is widespread agreement among scientists that geneti-cally Ìýmodified Ìýfoods Ìýare Ìýsafe Ìýto Ìýconsume and Ìýhave Ìýthe Ìýpotential Ìý to Ìý provide Ìý substantial Ìý benefits Ìý to Ìý humankind3. However, Ìýmany Ìýpeople Ìýstill Ìýharbour Ìýconcerns Ìýabout Ìýthem Ìýor Ìýoppose Ìýtheir Ìýuse4,5. ÌýIn Ìýa Ìýnationally Ìýrepresentative Ìýsample Ìýof ÌýUS adults, we find that as extremity of opposition to and con-cern Ìýabout Ìýgenetically Ìýmodified Ìýfoods Ìýincreases, Ìýobjective Ìýknowledge Ìýabout Ìýscience Ìýand Ìýgenetics Ìýdecreases, Ìýbut Ìýper-ceived understanding of genetically modified foods increases. Extreme Ìýopponents Ìýknow Ìýthe Ìýleast, Ìýbut Ìýthink Ìýthey Ìýknow Ìýthe Ìýmost. ÌýMoreover, Ìýthe Ìýrelationship Ìýbetween Ìýself-assessed Ìýand Ìýobjective Ìýknowledge Ìýshifts Ìýfrom Ìýpositive Ìýto Ìýnegative Ìýat Ìýhigh Ìýlevels of opposition. Similar results were obtained in a paral-lel study with representative samples from the United States, France and Germany, and in a study testing attitudes about a medical Ìýapplication Ìýof Ìýgenetic Ìýengineering Ìýtechnology Ìý(gene Ìýtherapy). This pattern did not emerge, however, for attitudes and beliefs about climate change.

Marketing: Fernbach, P. M., Light, N., Scott, S. E., Inbar, Y., & Rozin, P. (2019). Extreme opponents of genetically modified foods know the least but think they know the most. Nature Human Behaviour